It has been more than two weeks since the terrorist attack in Benghazi and the FBI is still unable to access the US Consulate. Why? There was inadequate or no security to protect Ambassador Stevens and other Americans. Why? The White House lied about the murders being an act of terrorism. Why? And why is the FBI being denied access to the crime scene? Instead of answering questions, the Obama administration is creating them.
The Obama administration has continually lied to us. They have either outright lied or withheld information on the Ft. Hood shooting, the Arkansas recruiting center shooting, the shameless security leaks, Fast and Furious, and now the Benghazi massacre. Nixon was forced to resign for lying to us – so should Obama! If he won’t resign (which we know the narcissist would never do), he needs to be fired – before he destroys us all.
In a CNN interview Former Bush advisor Fran Townsend tells us:
“They had difficulty, and we understand there was some bureaucratic infighting between the FBI and Justice Department on the one hand, and the State Department on the other, and so it took them longer than they would have liked to get into country. They’ve now gotten there. But they still are unable to get permission to go to Benghazi.”
FBI agents have made a request through the U.S. State Department for the crime scene to be secured, Townsend said, but that has not happened.
“The senior law enforcement official I spoke to said, ‘If we get there now, it’s not clear that it will be of any use to us,’” Townsend said.
The FBI team has conducted interviews of State Department and U.S. government personnel who were in Libya at the time of the attack, Townsend said, but the FBI’s request to directly question individuals who Libyan authorities have in custody was denied.
And this from Hot Air:
Former CIA analyst Bob Baer also thinks the Libyans are being uncooperative, and says he can’t remember a case where the FBI’s been barred from the scene of an attack since Iran 1979. Why the Libyan government would refuse to let the feds in to look around, I have no idea, but it’s highly suspicious given that they’re potentially risking U.S. foreign aid by refusing the request. The alternative explanation, that they want to let the feds in but simply can’t reliably secure the area with so many militias running around, is actually worse because it underscores just how perilous the situation was for Chris Stevens and the consulate without a serious American security detail. That’s what ABC says is happening: Benghazi’s just too dangerous for a U.S. government agency to be picking through the rubble, even though CNN and other media have found ways to gain access to the site. And yet, apparently, Stevens’s superiors decided he’d be better off with less security, not more. Huh.
The coverup continues – worse than Watergate? You decide – in November! Your security, and that of your family and country depend on it.
- Obama’s Libyan Lies – Cover-Up Peeling Away (lettingfreedomring.com)
- U.S. Officials Knew Libya Attacks Were Work of Al Qaeda Affiliates (lettingfreedomring.com)
- Walid Shoebat: Innocence of Muslims Film was Made by Terrorists (lettingfreedomring.com)
- Jay Carney Lies About Benghazi Again (pjmedia.com)
- Why isn’t the FBI investigating the Benghazi terrorist attack? (americanthinker.com)
- That FBI Investigation in Benghazi Hasn’t Even Started Yet (commentarymagazine.com)