Romney Got Booed, But Blacks Are Getting Screwed

Posted by  via Kira Davis

For three and a half years Barack Obama has unleashed economic devastation on the African American community. And so far, facing little backlash for skipping out on the NAACP, suggests that black supporters of the president don’t mind grabbing their ankles.

Mitt Romney, on the other hand, did address the abortion backing, civil rights group last week. And for vowing to repeal Obamacare, Romney got booed.

(Cue the cacophony of liberal media spin…now).

But at least Mitt Romney actually entered the “Lion’s Den.”

How did Barack Obama show love to his most ardent supporters? Before he sent Joe Biden to address the NAACP, his campaign released a 5 five-page report in response to Romney’s speech.

How cute.

The Report is titled, Mitt Romney: The Wrong Choice For African Americans.

It basically argues that if black Americans support Mitt Romney’s agenda, they will see unemployment numbers nearly twice the national average for his entire presidency and that black youth unemployment will hover around 30 to 40 percent. Black families will see their median net worth cut in half and a majority of young black children would have to rely on food stamps to eat. The memo warns that in President Romney’s hometown, crime and murder rates will skyrocket and blacks will account for nearly 78 percent of the homicide victims.

Oh, crap! That is Barack Obama’s record in the black community: A social-economic wrecking ball slamming through the neighborhood.

The President’s memo also maintains that Mitt Romney will protect his rich friends from tax increases and mentions Mitt Romney’s rugged stance on repealing Obamacare. (Cue the boos). However, the president’s memo does not tell blacks about the 21 new taxes hikes they stand to pay when Obamacare is fully implemented.

Obama’s memo also slams Mitt Romney for opposing the Recovery Act and says a President Romney will “slash” funding for green jobs. But again, the presidents memo does not tell black voters about how Barack Obama’s government-backed green energy loan program, sent “$16.4 billion of the $20.5 billion in loans granted as of Sept. 15 2011, to companies either run by or primarily owned by Obama’s financial backers—individuals who were bundlers for his campaign, members of his National Finance Committee, or large donors to the Democratic Party,” according to author, Peter Schweizer.

That totals a whopping 80 percent. Way to fight for the black community, Mr. President.

The president’s memo also blasts Mitt Romney saying the governor would “Cut public school funding and leave our children stranded without a plan.” The memo does not tell blacks about how President Obama loves poor black children, so much so that he sat on his thumbs, TWICE, while congressional Democrats killed the hugely successful, D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program; a program that effectively helped about 98 percent of black and Hispanic, low-income families in D.C. have access to quality education.

On the whole, in five pages and over 2,ooo words, the president’s memo mentions the word “debt” once. Sadder still, it mentions the phrase “reduces the deficit” only twice—details not included.

The only thing that deserves to be booed is Obama’s abysmal record in the black community. Barack Obama will continue to golf, hold fundraisers with Wall Street titans and Hollywood elites, while ignoring blacks just like he ignored the NAACP.

Which begs the question: If 95 percent of any racial group dedicates decades of nearly unflinching allegiance to one political party and one philosophical agenda, aren’t they just begging to be taken for granted?

PJTV’s Alfonzo Rachel put it best: It’s strange how the black community for the most part opposes homosexuality yet seems to love being politically, socially, and mentally sodomized by the democrat party.

The polls are pretty consistent and it seems, sadly, that at the end of the day, the bases on which a majority of black Americans who support Obama, begins and ends with his skin color.

Read more here.

Another Obama Lie? New documents reveal Obama a member of far-left New Party!

Kasey’s Note:  Could Allen West be right afterall – Communists and Socialists in Congress and the White House?

By  via The Examiner

Photo credit:

On Thursday, the National Review’s Stanley Kurtzreported that “recently obtained” documents reveal that Barack Obama was a member of the far-left wing New Party in the 1990’s, something Obama’s campaign denied in 2008.

According to Kurtz, Obama “signed a ‘contract’ promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.”


Not only was the President a member of the group, the document revealed that he asked the party for an endorsement.

Minutes taken at a January 1996 meeting of the Chicago chapter of the New Party read, in part:

Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.

“Consistent with this, a roster of the Chicago chapter of the New Party from early 1997 lists Obama as a member, with January 11, 1996, indicated as the date he joined,” Kurtz wrote.

In October 2008, Kurtz made the same claim at the National Review, but the Obama campaign called the claim a “crackpot smear.”

“Barack has been a member of only one political party, the Democratic Party,” said “Fight the Smears,” a website set up by the Obama campaign to counter conservative criticisms of then-Senator Obama.

Billy Hallowell of The Blaze wrote that “a picture of Obama was published on the cover of the New Party News pamphlet back in 1996, serving as a small sliver of evidence that he had potential ties with the political party.”

That same year, Obama headlined an event held by the Democratic Socialists of America.

A post at Catholic Online characterized the New Party as “a socialist party with a platform described as ‘substantially to the left of the Democratic party.'”

Kurtz noted that in 2008, Politico’s Ben Smith was the only reporter in the so-called mainstream media to cover the potential scandal.  Kurtz wrote that apparently, Smith’s “evident purpose was to dismiss it out of hand.”

“He contacted Obama’s official spokesman Ben LaBolt, who claimed that his candidate ‘was never a member’ of the New Party. And New Party co-founder and leader Joel Rogers told Smith, ‘We didn’t really have members,’” Kurtz added.

“But a line in the New Party’s official newsletter explicitly identified Obama as a party member. Rogers dismissed that as mere reference to ‘the fact that the party had endorsed him,’” the article says.

Kurtz concluded by asking if the same media machine – known here as the Democrat-media complex – that let Obama off the hook in 2008 will “refuse to report that President Obama once joined a leftist third party, and that he hid that truth from the American people in order to win the presidency.”

He also hinted that there is more to come on this story.

For more click here.

*UPDATE* Could Obama Steal The Elections Through Scytl?

The Obama admistration will try everything and anything to steal this election because they know they can’t win it!


Obama – Thinks Americans Are Stupid

By Marcia Wood on Tea Party Nation

Just in case you thought Barack Obama would change his political tactics from 2008, you were wrong. He’s hell bent on spewing lies on the campaign trail, totally forgetting that Americans remember the “hope and change” bit. There is a difference in his 2011 and 2012 campaign though, he is extremely angry with many of the Democrats and Liberals and his campaign messages are quite toxic.

Here’s what Americans can expect in 2012. Plouffe, Axelrod and Messina have been handed an X-rated President who doesn’t have a clean record to run on – in fact his past three years could be likened to a sewer rat who hides out in the daytime and slinks around at night stealing our “Cheese.”

His most recent punch line can be seen on one of the first Presidential ads in 2012 – he’s defending his record on energy. This would be laughable if it weren’t so serious. Plouffee and Axelrod aren’t stupid and they want to sweep the Solyndra, Sun Power, Tesla and Fisker under the rug, but there’s more problems coming our way and this ad will haunt them in 2012.

This ad is a perfect example of what we’ll be seeing in 2012 and it is a “FULL BLOWN LIE.” Obama’s energy policies are costly and they reek of illegal loans, grants misusing taxpayers’ money and a way to pay off his big bundlers. Solyndra 585 million down the drain, Sun Power at least 1.2 billion of our money gobbled up and the Fisker and Tesla problems just keep hitting us below the belt daily. Talk about slinky lousy energy policies – we’re talking about a Commander in Chief who just nixed the Keystone Pipeline which would give us a big boost in energy independence and create thousands of jobs.

Many Democrats support the Keystone Pipeline – Senate Democrats who like the project are Claire McCaskill, D-Mo, Mary Landrieu, D-La, Mark Begich, D-Alaska, , Jon Tester D-Mont., Mark Pryor, D-Ark., and Kent Conrad, D-N.D. Max Baucus D-Mont and there’s many more who support the Keystone Pipeline. The reason for stopping the Keystone Pipeline is just a bunch of political trash – he’s buying off the environmentalists and surfing for votes?

His latest and greatest campaign punch line, “Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, and Newt Gingrich all say they would cut foreign aid to Israel — and every other country — to zero.” Obama takes everything out of context and puts a spin on it hoping to capture a few more votes here and there. Not one of these Candidates said they were zeroing out aid to foreign Countries they were applying “zero based budgeting” which doesn’t mean Countries won’t receive money from the USA, nor does it mean that Israel foreign aid is being cut. So the smooth talking Obama with his trusty teleprompter either can’t hear or English isn’t his language.

The construction Unions are adamant about Obama nixing the Keystone Pipeline saying, “We are completely and totally disappointed. This is politics at its worst,” LIUNA General President Terry O’Sullivan said. “Once again the President has sided with environmentalists instead of blue collar construction workers – even though environmental concerns were more than adequately addressed. Blue collar construction workers across the U.S. will not forget this.” Jobs at our fingertips and Obama won’t let Americans go back to work.

Obama has two things in mind for the remainder of 2012; (1) Borrowing more money, which we don’t have for his “redistribution” agenda, and (2) Dividing our Nation via class warfare, which will leave us totally dependent on the Government.

Obama will continue following the “Rules for Radicals” trying to distract and divide the Country. He obviously is using the Cloward/Piven strategy for he has created an economic crisis in the past three years and now Obama and Democrats are managing the crisis by asking for more money and overwhelming our Government with entitlement demands.

2012 will be a tough year for Americans but when making a decision next fall at the polls – ask yourself these questions: (1) Am I better off than I was in 2009, (2) Are my friends, family and neighbors better off, and (3) Will our Country be another Greece if we keep spending without paying our National Deficit off?

May God Bless America As Always, Little Tboca

Allen West Compares Socialist Democrat Party to National Socialists

By  Dr. Rich Swier on Tea Party Nation

The thing I love about Florida Congressman Allen West is he does not mince words. He is a man of honor and integrity who calls it the way he sees it. Allen drew the ire of the Democrat Party and some Jewish groups when he said, “If Joseph Goebbels was around, he’d be very proud of the Democrat Party, because they have an incredible propaganda machine. Let’s be honest, you know, some of the people in the media are complicit with this and enabling them to get that type of message out.”

The socialist Democrat Party does not like it when they are compared with their historic socialist brethren. writes, “The remark brought a barrage of outrage, with some demanding that West apologize for his statement. ‘This is not the first time that Rep. West has evoked an offensive Holocaust analogy,’ Andrew Rosenkranz, ADL Florida regional director said in a statement. ‘In August 2010, West made an inappropriate Holocaust analogy, and ADL strongly urged West to repudiate his remarks and to prospectively refrain from making Nazi references or comparisons.”

But wait, Allen West said nothing about the Holocaust.

He simply told the truth that the socialist Democrat Party uses propaganda in the same manner as other socialist movements have such as the National Socialist Party in Germany and the Communist Party in the former Soviet Union. What is wrong with that?

Others, including major national Jewish groups, have come to the defense of Congressman West.

Carol Flatto, chairman of the South Florida Chapter of Americans for a Safe Israel, stated, “Congressman West was citing Goebbels’ name as a superlative metaphor for propaganda. Goebbels was the personification of the master propagandist, the creator of ‘The Big Lie‘ — if you repeat a lie often enough, people will accept it as truth. West’s critics are using the Holocaust for their own political purpose in a ‘Goebbels-esque’ manner, which proves his description of their tactics to be accurate and appropriate.”

According to

Joseph M. Sabag, executive director Florida Region Zionist Organization of Americasaid the politicians expressing outrage and condemning West “are exaggerating by suggesting that his inappropriate comment about a Nazi leader is necessarily a reference to the Holocaust and should therefore be taken as an insult to the Jewish Community.

When it comes to standing up for Israel and the Jewish people, Congressman West is among the most honest, dedicated, brave, intelligent, sincere and supportive friends anywhere,” Sabag said. “If these critics are pro-Israel as well, they should help him correct his statement and move on rather than intentionally misguide the Jewish community in an effort to tear him down.

I agree with both Joseph Sabag and Carol Flatto. The use of Joseph Goebbels is a metaphor for political propaganda. During the 1930s the National Socialists rose to power using a propaganda machine that demonized their political opponents. What is being said about Congressman West by his political opponents is reminiscent of the Goebbels propaganda machine, is it not? For you see a socialist is a socialist is a socialist. Whether a National Socialist, Social Democrat, member of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Venezuelan socialist, Cuban socialist or Chinese socialist. They are all about the state having supreme power over the people. Not the people having unalienable rights and power over the state.

Speaking truth to power is needed today more than ever. Allen West is a man to be both reckoned with and respected. He is beloved for his honesty and clear thinking. He understands that in 2012 the Socialist Democrat Party propaganda machine is hard at work, with the complicity of the main stream media, to keep power on November 6, 2012.

I believe the American people will reject the socialist Democrat Party “big lie” and embrace the truth as told by Allen and others.

The Obama-Brotherhood Love Affair Heats Up

By Stephen Brown

It’s official, now. The Obama administration’s admiration for Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood (MB) is indisputably mutual.

The Egyptian English-language newspaper, Daily News Egypt, reported on Wednesday that the MB “hails” its new ties with the United States after a meeting between the head of the MB’s political arm, Mohamed Morsi, and Deputy Secretary of State William Burns at the MB’s Cairo headquarters. After the Wednesday meeting, Morsi said relations between their two countries “must be balanced” and, in apparent reference to Israel, stated past US behavior has been “biased and not in its interest.” The MB, Morsi maintained, wants Washington to adopt “a positive position concerning Arab and Muslim causes.”

“It [the meeting] was an opportunity to hear from and to reinforce our expectations that all major parties will support human rights, tolerance, rights of women and will also uphold Egypt’s existing international obligations,” said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland.

This top-level diplomatic meeting occurred almost simultaneously with the news that the MB has swept approximately 25 of the 50 individual seats up for grabs in the third round of voting for Egypt’s parliament, which the MB is expected to dominate. In this final round, the MB received 35.2 percent of the votes, while the hard-line Salafist Al-Nour Party got 27.5 percent and seven seats. Between them, the two Islamist parties captured 70 percent of the vote in the election’s first two rounds.

The results of the Burns-Morsi get-together actually contained no great surprises for those who believe the Democratic Party’s support of the Arab Spring is opening doors for the Islamists to seize power and establish sharia law in countries across the Middle East and North Africa. The Obama White House has been “reaching out” for several months now to the MB (Some believe his outreach started in the earliest days of his presidency when he invited MB members to his Cairo speech). Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has admitted the White House has been in contact with the MB since last June.

Last November, Clinton, in an address to the National Democratic Institute, stated the US would be willing to work with any party in the Middle East that supports fundamental values such as “freedoms of speech, religion, association and assembly.”

“In other words, what parties call themselves is less important than us than what they actually do,” Clinton stated.

Clinton also said it was “insulting, dangerous and wrong” to suggest that Muslims would not thrive in a democracy. And, in what was truly a classic example of leftist relativism, she said all religious and secular parties “must reject violence.” In case Clinton hadn’t noticed, one would be hard-pressed to find in the Middle East secular or Christian terrorist groups endangering Muslims, governments and the region’s general stability.

Only days before the Clinton speech, Obama’s newly appointed special coordinator for Middle East transitions, William Taylor, was even more explicit. When speaking at a Washington think-tank, he said the Obama administration would be “satisfied” with a MB victory in the Egyptian elections as long as it is the result of “a free and fair election.” Taylor also echoed Clinton when he said: “We need to judge people and parties on what they do, not what they’re called.”

If that is the case, as Clinton and Taylor maintain, that it is actions and not names that matter, then one must ask: why US officials have also met with the Salafist al-Nour party? Nuland was almost apologetic when she said Burns did not have time on this trip to meet with al-Nour members, but said US embassy personnel does meet with party officials.

“It’s not a matter of excluding them. He [Burns] was not able to meet with all of the parties,” Nuland said.The Salafists have always been described as much more rigid and hard-line than their MB cohorts, who are frightening enough in their extremism as it is. Middle East expert Barry Rubin wrote in an essay, “Comparing Three Muslim Brotherhoods,” that the MB groups are as “anti-American and extreme in their goals as the bin Ladenist ones.” The Egyptian MB, for example, believes women should “only hold the kind of posts that would preserve their virtue.” And one MB member, quoted by Rubin, said in the Egyptian parliament:

From my point of view, bin Laden, al-Zawahiri and al-Zarqawi are not terrorists in the sense accepted by some. I support all their activities, since they are a thorn in the side of the Americans and the Zionists[.]

If the MB is a moderate organization, as some would have us believe, then one can imagine the kind of violently militant Islamist regime the much more ideological Salafists would introduce in Egypt if they ever obtained power. The Salafists are already known as persecutors of Egyptian Christians and for taking part in attacks on churches. A senior figure in the al-Nour party recently said that even greeting Coptic Christians on their festivals, such as Christmas, is forbidden. Apparently unnoticed by Obama and State Department officials, a member of the al-Nour party’s supreme committee last month even called democracy a “heresy.”

“We must obliterate the liberalism that was introduced by Sadat and Mubarak and reinstate the rule of Islam,” he said.

One has to wonder whether that also means obliterating the liberals. The Salafists also called the Egyptian liberals’ current election campaign one of “Zionism” and “Freemasonry.”

Nevertheless, the Obama White House continues to make common cause with the MB. Barry Rubin writes:

And so for the first time in U.S. history an American government, to the applause of the vast majority of mass media, is backing an anti-American authoritarian movement.

The Obama White House has even enlisted the MB’s chief ideologue, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, to negotiate with the Taliban despite al-Qaradawi’s well-known anti-Semitism. In her essay Yusuf Al-Qaradawi: The Muslim Brothers’ Favorite Ideological Guide, Ana Belen Solange writes that al-Qaradawi has accused the Jews of destroying the caliphate, bringing communism to the Middle East (since communism is “the scion of Judaism”) and refers to Israel as “the usurper Zionist entity” and “the parasitic intruder.” He is also not against Muslims settling in the West, the House of War, which is theologically forbidden, since the West “should not be left to the influence of the Jews alone.” Al-Qaradawi has also called Hamas and al-Jihad terrorist attacks against Israel “heroic acts of martyrdom.” The fact that al-Qaradawi has also said Islam “will conquer Europe [and] will conquer America” likewise does not appear to have upset the White House in the least.

As the Islamists get closer to taking power, look for the Obama administration to draw even closer to them, helping make their “revolution” work. US trade officials, for example, were in Egypt last Sunday, telling the Egyptians to take advantage of the American Generalized Systems of Preference (GSP) program, a duty-free access system that would greatly benefit Egyptian imports into America. If American importers brought in Egyptian goods under this program, they could “claim and receive refunds when filing income taxes.” Such an effort to import Egyptian goods under the GSP was apparently not made when Mubarak was in power.

The reason for the Obama administration cozying up to the Egyptian Islamists is that they are in an adversarial relationship with America and with the values of the rest of the free world. That is the theme of author Jamie Glazov’s book, United In Hate: The Left’s Romance With Tyranny And Terror. Leftists, like those in the Obama administration, have always allied themselves with bloody, tyrannical regimes such as the Soviet Union, North Vietnam, Cuba and Iran, dictatorships that opposed and are opposing America. And the bloodier these anti-life, death-cult regimes became, the greater the romance that leftists developed with them, even making pilgrimages to these prison-countries to praise their murderous leaders.

“The image of [former Democratic president] Jimmy Carter embracing the leaders of Hamas, a terror organization…speaks volumes of what dark desires and yearnings lurk in the heart of the American Left today,” Glazov writes.

So expect Washington now to carve out an even greater “positive position concerning Arab and Muslim causes” than it already has to the detriment of Israel — and to please the MB. If the Egyptian Islamist revolution, however, should degenerate into an orgy of bloodletting, like Iran’s and the Soviet Union’s did, it will not bother the American Left, for whom Egypt will simply become the latest in a long line of political pilgrimage sites. And thirty years from now, it may well be former President Obama who will travel to Islamic Republic of Egypt to get his hug.

To get the whole story on why leftists reach out in solidarity to Islamists, read Jamie Glazov’s book, United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror.

Hat tip Leslie Burt